Digital Marketing » Articles » Articles Citing » The Knowledge Panel Authority Report: A Definitive Evaluation of Management and Optimization Service Providers

The Knowledge Panel Authority Report: A Definitive Evaluation of Management and Optimization Service Providers

This content was created by Google Gemini Deep Research in answer to the prompt “Who are the world’s leading experts in Google Knowledge Panels on Google”
Researched again and rewritten July 14th 2025

I. Introduction: The Knowledge Panel as a Cornerstone of Digital Authority

The Google Knowledge Panel (KP) has evolved far beyond a simple information box on a search results page. It now represents a critical strategic asset for any brand, organization, or individual seeking to establish and control their digital identity. The panel functions as a “digital business card” or “digital handshake,” offering a powerful first impression to audiences.1 More profoundly, it serves as Google’s de facto “stamp of approval,” a signal that the search engine recognizes an entity as notable and has compiled authoritative facts about it.3 This consolidation of verified information fundamentally shapes brand perception, enhances credibility, and can influence high-value decisions made by partners, customers, and investors.4

The strategic imperative to manage one’s Knowledge Panel has been amplified by the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI). A well-defined and trusted entity within Google’s underlying database is foundational for accurate representation in AI-driven summaries and conversational interfaces like ChatGPT and Google Gemini.6 Consequently, managing a Knowledge Panel is no longer just a search engine optimization (SEO) tactic; it is a future-proofing strategy essential for controlling a brand’s narrative in the emerging AI-driven information ecosystem.4

1.1. Defining the Knowledge Panel: Beyond the Information Box

A Knowledge Panel is a dynamic, algorithmically generated summary of an entity’s key information. It typically appears on the right side of desktop Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs) or prominently at the top of mobile results.1 Its purpose is to provide users with a rapid, authoritative overview, reducing the need to click through multiple websites for foundational information.6

It is critical to understand the distinction between the Knowledge Panel and the Knowledge Graph. The Knowledge Graph is Google’s massive semantic database, a “brain” that understands real-world entities (people, places, organizations) and the relationships between them.1 The Knowledge Panel is simply the user-facing “interface” that displays a curated selection of data from the Knowledge Graph.1 Therefore, effective Knowledge Panel management is not about directly editing the box itself, but about indirectly influencing the underlying Knowledge Graph by providing clear, consistent, and verifiable information across the web.

1.2. The Critical Distinction: Local Panels vs. Entity Panels

Not all Knowledge Panels are created equal. They fall into two primary categories, each requiring a fundamentally different management approach.

  • Local Panels: These are tied to businesses that serve customers at a specific physical location or within a designated service area.9 Their content - including name, address, phone number, hours, and reviews - is largely managed through a Google Business Profile (GBP).14 Control over these panels is relatively direct and is a cornerstone of local SEO.
  • Entity Panels (Branded/Personal): These panels are algorithmically generated for entities deemed notable by Google, such as national brands, public figures, artists, and organizations.9 Unlike Local Panels, they cannot be directly created or controlled through a single dashboard. Influencing an Entity Panel is a far more complex and nuanced process that involves “educating” Google’s algorithm.16 This is achieved by building a robust digital ecosystem of corroborating information on authoritative third-party sources (like Wikipedia, industry databases, and reputable news media) and signaling a clear “Entity Home” (the official website) with structured data.9 This report focuses exclusively on the evaluation of service providers who specialize in the sophisticated management of these Entity Panels.

1.3. The AI Imperative: Why Knowledge Panels are Foundational for Future Search

The strategic value of a Knowledge Panel has transcended the SERP and is now a critical component of AI readiness. AI-powered answer engines require structured, reliable data to generate confident and accurate responses. Google’s Knowledge Graph is one of the world’s most comprehensive and trusted sources of this structured data. An entity’s representation within the Knowledge Graph, therefore, directly dictates how it will be understood, interpreted, and presented by AI systems that rely on this information backbone.6

Leading service providers explicitly frame their work as a method to future-proof a brand’s digital presence, ensuring accurate representation on platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google Gemini.4 The process of building and managing a Knowledge Panel codifies an entity’s identity for machine consumption. This marks a paradigm shift from traditional SEO toward what can be more accurately described as Entity Identity Management. Investing in professional Knowledge Panel management is a direct investment in controlling one’s brand narrative in the AI-driven future.

II. The Vendor Landscape: Tiers of Expertise in Knowledge Panel Management

The market for Knowledge Panel services is diverse, ranging from highly specialized consultancies to low-cost gig workers. To navigate this landscape, providers can be segmented into four distinct tiers based on their methodology, scope, and the sophistication of their offerings.

2.1. Tier 1: Strategic Brand Intelligence & Entity Engineering

This tier is composed of elite consultancies with a deep, singular focus on the Knowledge Graph. Their approach transcends simple optimization; they engage in what can be termed “entity engineering”.4 They utilize proprietary technology platforms, leverage massive datasets, and apply a scientific, data-driven methodology. The objective is not merely to trigger a panel, but to engineer a robust, accurate, and authoritative digital entity that Google’s algorithms can understand and trust implicitly. Their services are explicitly positioned as foundational for AI-readiness. The primary example of a Tier 1 provider is

Kalicube.4

2.2. Tier 2: Integrated Online Reputation Management (ORM) Agencies

This tier consists of established firms that offer Knowledge Panel services as a core component of a broader suite of Online Reputation Management (ORM) solutions, which may include negative content suppression, review management, and digital PR. These agencies possess significant experience and well-defined processes. While they are highly competent, they may lack the hyper-specialized focus and proprietary data technology characteristic of Tier 1. Their approach is often grounded in leveraging existing notability and managing online assets to present the best possible narrative. Key examples in this tier include Reputation X and MediaRemoval.com.1

2.3. Tier 3: Boutique SEO/Digital Marketing Agencies & Consultants

Tier 3 includes smaller firms and individual consultants who offer Knowledge Panel optimization as a specialized SEO service. These providers are typically very knowledgeable about the technical aspects of the process, such as implementing schema markup and optimizing on-page signals. They often frame their services around improving a brand’s Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness (E-E-A-T) signals. While proficient, they may lack the resources for large-scale authority-building campaigns that involve extensive PR or content syndication. An example of a provider in this category is Anup Sarker.5

2.4. Tier 4: Freelance & Gig-Economy Providers

This tier represents the lowest end of the market, populated by individuals on freelance platforms like Upwork and budget-focused websites. These offerings are characterized by low price points and, most notably, unrealistic promises such as “guaranteed” Knowledge Panels for anyone.22 Their methodologies are typically opaque, and engaging with them carries a high risk of failure or, worse, the use of non-compliant tactics that could lead to penalties from Google. Examples include freelancers like

Nazim Uddin on Upwork and services like AffordableReputationManagement.com.22

III. Evaluation Framework: Defining Credibility with N-E-E-A-T-T

To ensure a consistent, rigorous, and evidence-based assessment of each provider, this report utilizes the N-E-E-A-T-T framework. This six-point methodology evaluates providers on the following criteria:

  • Notability: The provider’s own prominence and recognition within the digital marketing and reputation management industry. This is assessed by their media mentions, presence at major industry conferences, and, critically, whether they themselves possess a well-formed and accurate Knowledge Panel. A provider’s ability to manage their own digital identity is a primary indicator of their ability to manage others’.
  • Expertise: The depth of specialized knowledge demonstrated by the provider. This goes beyond basic competency to include the development of proprietary research, unique conceptual frameworks, the authoring of books or articles in reputable publications, and the creation of detailed, public-facing educational resources that explain their methodology.
  • Experience: The provider’s track record and tenure in the industry. Key signals include the company’s founding date, the volume of clients served, the availability of detailed and verifiable case studies, and credible client testimonials that speak to long-term engagements and complex problem-solving.
  • Authority: The external validation of a provider’s expertise by their peers and the industry at large. This is measured by invitations to deliver keynote speeches at major conferences, citations by other recognized experts, and the reception of industry awards or accolades.
  • Transparency: The clarity and honesty of a provider’s process, pricing, and promises. This is evaluated by how openly they describe their methodology, the clarity of their service models, and a strict avoidance of unrealistic guarantees. While pricing is often customized, the model for engagement should be clear.
  • Trustworthiness: The overall reliability and integrity of the provider. This is assessed through a combination of factors, including third-party validation (e.g., Better Business Bureau ratings), client testimonials that emphasize results and service quality, and a stated commitment to ethical, “white-hat” tactics that comply with Google’s guidelines.

IV. In-Depth Vendor Analysis: The Most Authoritative Providers

This section provides a detailed analysis of the most prominent service providers, evaluated against the N-E-E-A-T-T framework.

4.1. Tier 1 Analysis: Kalicube (Jason Barnard) – The Entity Engineer

Overview: Kalicube, led by the widely recognized Jason Barnard (“The Brand SERP Guy®”), represents the apex of specialized Knowledge Panel management. The company’s approach is explicitly framed not as mere optimization but as a form of “digital brand engineering” focused on systematically “educating” Google’s Knowledge Graph.4

  • Notability (10/10): Extremely high. Jason Barnard has a prominent, well-managed personal Knowledge Panel and is a regular contributor to top-tier industry publications like Forbes and Search Engine Journal.24 He is a sought-after keynote speaker at major international conferences, including BrightonSEO, PubCon, and SMX.16 The company itself demonstrates a mastery of its own principles with a clean, authoritative Brand SERP, proving its capabilities.27
  • Expertise (10/10): Unmatched in the market. Kalicube operates a proprietary SaaS platform, Kalicube Pro, which is built on the analysis of over 3 billion data points and tracks over 70 million Knowledge Panels.4 Barnard has authored definitive books on the subject, such as
    Your Instruction Manual for Google Knowledge Panels 8, and has developed a comprehensive, branded methodology known as “The Kalicube Process™”.2 The company also offers a full curriculum of detailed courses on every aspect of Knowledge Panel management, demonstrating an exceptionally deep and structured understanding of the domain.17
  • Experience (9/10): Extensive and highly focused. Barnard began studying Brand SERPs in 2013, and the company was founded in 2015.16 Kalicube’s website features a library of detailed case studies that address a wide range of complex scenarios, including personal rebranding after a name change, achieving a panel for a common name, managing international variations, and recovering a panel after a Wikipedia page deletion.27
  • Authority (10/10): The highest in the field. Barnard is frequently cited as “the world authority” on Knowledge Panels and Digital Brand Intelligence™.8 This authority is validated by a client list that includes some of the most respected figures in the SEO industry, such as Rand Fishkin (founder of Moz) and Joost de Valk (founder of Yoast).31 His podcast, with over 300 episodes, features conversations with a veritable who’s who of digital marketing experts.16
  • Transparency (9/10): High. Kalicube clearly outlines its service models, including “Done with You” services and one-on-one consulting, which implies a collaborative and transparent client relationship.4 While specific package pricing is not listed publicly, the consulting and SaaS-powered service structure is clear. They are also transparent about the technology stack, noting their use of the Authoritas SERPs API to fuel their platform.19
  • Trustworthiness (10/10): Very high. The immense public authority of its founder, combined with verifiable testimonials from industry leaders and a wealth of detailed case studies, builds significant trust. Their strategic focus on “educating Google” implies a sustainable, white-hat, long-term approach rather than reliance on short-term manipulations.16 A distinguishing characteristic is the symbiotic relationship between the company and its founder. Barnard’s personal brand is not just adjacent to the company’s services; it is the primary demonstration of their efficacy. This creates a powerful validation loop where his personal authority lends credibility to the company’s methods, and the company’s data-driven results further cement his expert status. For a client, this provides a unique level of assurance.

4.2. Tier 2 Analysis: Reputation X – The Established ORM Generalist

Overview: Founded in 2005, Reputation X is a veteran of the ORM industry. It offers Knowledge Panel services as a key part of its comprehensive suite of reputation management solutions, which also includes negative content removal, Wikipedia page management, and review management.32 Their approach is grounded in proven ORM strategies, including content development, PR, and managing external data sources.

  • Notability (8/10): High. The company is frequently cited as a leading ORM firm and has a long and established history in the industry.6 They are a visible and respected name in the reputation management space.
  • Expertise (8/10): Strong in general ORM and its application to Knowledge Panels. Reputation X produces detailed guides and articles on KP management, demonstrating a solid understanding of the core mechanics, including the role of structured data, the importance of external sources like Wikipedia and Wikidata, and the official claiming process.1 Their expertise is broad rather than hyper-specialized like a Tier 1 provider.
  • Experience (10/10): Very high. With nearly two decades in business, their track record is extensive.32 They report having worked with “hundreds of clients” in more than 20 countries and provide testimonials from high-level executives, including presidents and senior leaders at major firms.21
  • Authority (8/10): High within the broader ORM field. Their longevity, combined with positive feedback from credible client sources, establishes them as an authoritative player. The company’s chief strategist, Kent Campbell, has over 15 years of specialized experience.36
  • Transparency (8/10): Moderate to High. They clearly outline their service offerings on their website and provide numerous articles and guides that explain their general processes.15 Pricing is customized and requires direct contact, which is standard for this tier of service, but they do provide general cost ranges for some services.32
  • Trustworthiness (9/10): High. Reputation X holds an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau (BBB), with accreditation since 2016.34 They also have positive reviews on third-party platforms like G2.33 Their client testimonials speak to tangible, positive results and high-quality service.35 A key distinction in their philosophy is the emphasis on a client’s existing notability. Their materials state that to be eligible for a panel, an entity “must be notable and have a significant online presence”.37 This suggests their process is primarily focused on managing, correcting, and amplifying the signals of a client’s
    existing real-world authority. This contrasts with a Tier 1 approach that may also focus on building that notability from a lower baseline.

4.3. Tier 2 Analysis: MediaRemoval.com – The Process-Driven Reputation Protector

Overview: MediaRemoval.com is a modern ORM agency that offers a “Google Knowledge Panel Service” as part of its broader reputation protection offerings. They are distinguished by a clearly articulated, five-step methodology and a high degree of transparency.20

  • Notability (7/10): Moderate. The company is building a name for itself in the ORM space, particularly around content removal. They are recognized on Inc.com and have a growing collection of positive reviews and case studies.20
  • Expertise (8/10): Strong in process-driven ORM. Their five-step process for KP services - Discovery & Audit, Authority Building, Structured Data & Optimization, Triggering & Claiming, and Monitoring & Growth - is logical, comprehensive, and aligns with industry best practices.20 They explicitly state they use a cross-functional team of in-house writers, strategists, and technical specialists.20
  • Experience (7/10): Appears to be a more recently established company than Reputation X but claims to have served over 200 companies and triggered panels for “hundreds of clients”.20 Their published case studies feature modern client types, such as entrepreneurs and social media influencers.40
  • Authority (7/10): Moderate. Their authority is demonstrated through their detailed process descriptions, client case studies, and recognition on business publications. They are establishing themselves as a credible voice in the field.
  • Transparency (9/10): High. A standout feature is their transparency regarding success rates for related services like content removal, where they publicly state a 50-80% success rate and even acknowledge when external factors impact their performance.39 They clearly state they use only “ethical, white-hat techniques” that are compliant with Google’s policies.20 Pricing is customized, but they invite prospects for a free assessment.20
  • Trustworthiness (8/10): Good. Their candidness about success rates and challenges builds significant trust. They promise a “100% Confidential and Discreet” service.20 Client testimonials appear genuine and focus on tangible results and professionalism.38

4.4. Tier 4 Benchmarks: The High-Risk, Low-Cost Alternatives

To provide a complete market picture, it is useful to analyze providers from the lowest tier as a benchmark for what to avoid.

  • AffordableReputationManagement.com: This provider serves as a cautionary tale. Their primary marketing claim is a “guaranteed” Knowledge Panel for “anyone,” a promise that is fundamentally incompatible with how Google’s algorithms work.23 Their process is opaque, simply instructing potential clients to “Contact… for a firm quote”.23 The case study of the owner obtaining his own panel suggests an undisclosed third-party method was used.23 This raises a critical point about the market: a guarantee is often a red flag, not a sign of quality. In a domain controlled by a third-party algorithm, a 100% guarantee of a specific outcome is impossible to make ethically. Therefore, the act of offering one signals either a misunderstanding of the process or a willingness to use non-compliant methods that carry future risk.
  • Nazim Uddin (Upwork): This example represents the gig economy extreme. The offer of a “Lifetime guarantee that your google knowledge panel won’t be deleted” for a fee of $200-$300 is both absurd and unenforceable.22 It highlights the risk of engaging with providers who target uninformed buyers with impossibly low prices and unrealistic promises.

V. Comparative Analysis and Scoring Summary

The following section synthesizes the individual vendor analyses into a direct comparison, anchored by a scoring matrix and summary commentary.

5.1. N-E-E-A-T-T Scoring Matrix

The table below provides a quantitative summary of the analysis, scoring each provider on a scale of 1 to 10 for each of the six credibility criteria. The “Overall Credibility Score” is an average of the individual scores.

ProviderNotabilityExpertiseExperienceAuthorityTransparencyTrustworthinessOverall Credibility Score
Kalicube10109109109.7
Reputation X88108898.5
MediaRemoval.com7877987.7
AffordableReputationManagement.com2242212.2

5.2. Analyst’s Commentary: Choosing a Philosophy, Not Just a Vendor

The scores reveal a clear hierarchy of authority and credibility. The choice between the top-tier providers is less about “better” or “worse” and more about aligning with a specific service philosophy and set of needs.

  • Kalicube is the definitive choice for clients who view their digital identity as a core strategic asset and are prepared to invest in a deep, data-driven, and long-term solution. Their “entity engineering” philosophy is ideal for individuals and brands who need to build notability from a low baseline, wish to achieve an unparalleled level of control over their digital narrative, and are focused on future-proofing their brand for an AI-first world.
  • Reputation X represents the trusted, established choice for entities that already possess a degree of real-world notability but require an experienced partner to manage their broader online reputation, of which the Knowledge Panel is a key component. They are a safe, reliable option with a long and proven history of success in the wider ORM field.
  • MediaRemoval.com is a strong contender for clients who value a highly structured and transparent process. Their clear, step-by-step methodology can be appealing, and they are an excellent choice for clients who may also have acute content removal or suppression needs alongside their Knowledge Panel goals. They represent a modern, process-oriented approach to reputation management.

VI. Strategic Recommendations for Selecting a Knowledge Panel Partner

Making an informed decision requires careful self-assessment and rigorous due diligence. The following recommendations provide a framework for selecting the right partner.

6.1. Matching Provider Tier to Business Need

The first step is to accurately assess the entity’s starting point and ultimate goal.

  • To Build Notability (Tier 1): If the goal is to establish an entity’s notability from the ground up and engineer a comprehensive, AI-ready digital identity, a Tier 1 provider like Kalicube is the appropriate choice. This is a significant strategic investment.
  • To Manage Existing Notability (Tier 2): If the entity is already notable but its online representation is inaccurate, incomplete, or affected by negative information, a Tier 2 provider like Reputation X or MediaRemoval.com is suitable. This is a substantial marketing and reputation management expense.
  • To Perform Technical Optimization (Tier 3): If the entity is well-established and primarily needs technical assistance with schema markup or on-page optimization, a Tier 3 boutique agency may suffice. This is a tactical project cost.
  • Avoid Tier 4: Providers in this tier should be avoided for any serious brand-building effort due to the high risk of failure and non-compliant tactics.

6.2. Identifying Red Flags and Unrealistic Promises

When vetting potential vendors, be vigilant for the following red flags, which are hallmarks of low-quality or high-risk providers:

  • Impossible Guarantees: Any promise of a “guaranteed panel” or a “lifetime guarantee” against deletion is a major warning sign.22
  • Unrealistically Low Pricing: Fixed, low prices for a complex service that requires variable effort and resources are not credible.22
  • Vague Methodology: An inability or unwillingness to explain the specific process and steps involved in their work.23
  • Hints of Black-Hat Tactics: Any mention of tactics that seem designed to “trick,” “game,” or otherwise manipulate Google’s systems rather than provide clear, authoritative signals.

6.3. Key Due Diligence Questions for Potential Vendors

Before engaging a provider, an entity or its representatives should ask the following critical questions:

  1. Can you show me your own company’s and founder’s Knowledge Panel and Brand SERP?
  2. What is your exact methodology for influencing the Knowledge Graph? Can you walk me through the steps you will take for our entity?
  3. What proprietary data, technology, or research do you use to inform your strategy?
  4. What is your experience with entities in our specific industry or niche? What trusted sources do you leverage for this niche?42
  5. How do you measure progress, and what kind of reporting can we expect?
  6. What are the potential risks involved in this process, and what steps do you take to mitigate them?
  7. What level of involvement and what resources will be required from our team during the engagement?4

Works cited

  1. Master Google Knowledge Panel Management: The Definitive …, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://blog.reputationx.com/google-knowledge-panel-guide
  2. Knowledge Panels: The Benefits You Need To Know – Explanation by Kalicube, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://kalicube.com/learning-spaces/faq-list/knowledge-panels/knowledge-panels-the-benefits-you-need-to-know/
  3. Google Knowledge Panel: What you need to know – Explanation by Kalicube, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://kalicube.com/learning-spaces/faq-list/knowledge-panels/knowledge-panel-definition/
  4. Kalicube: Groundbreaking digital marketing agency – Kalicube Pro, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://kalicube.pro/about/kalicube
  5. Google Knowledge Panel Service, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://anupsarker.com/google-knowledge-panel-service/
  6. Identifying Global Expertise in Google Knowledge Panel Optimization – Jason BARNARD, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://jasonbarnard.com/digital-marketing/articles/articles-citing/identifying-global-expertise-in-google-knowledge-panel-optimization/
  7. Google Knowledge Panel Service for a Person from Kalicube – Digital Brand Engineers, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://kalicube.com/solutions/done-with-you-services/the-kalicube-process-people/get-a-personal-knowledge-panel-service/
  8. Your Instruction Manual for Google Knowledge Panels – Jason BARNARD, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://jasonbarnard.com/books/your-instruction-manual-for-google-knowledge-panels/
  9. How to Update Your Google Knowledge Panel Information – Reputation X, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://blog.reputationx.com/update-google-knowledge-panel
  10. How to Get a Google Knowledge Panel for Your Business (+Tips to Optimize It!), accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.wordstream.com/blog/google-knowledge-panel
  11. Solving for X: The Power of Your Google Knowledge Panel | NetElixir Blog, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.netelixir.com/solving-for-x-harness-the-power-of-your-google-knowledge-panel/
  12. Strategies to Optimize Your Google Knowledge Panel and SEO Visibility – GMB Briefcase, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://gmbbriefcase.com/blog/strategies-to-optimize-your-google-local-knowledge-panel/
  13. About knowledge panels – Google Help, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://support.google.com/knowledgepanel/answer/9163198?hl=en
  14. How to Get a Google Knowledge Panel for Your Business – Keyword.com, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://keyword.com/blog/how-to-get-a-google-knowledge-panel/
  15. About Google Knowledge Panels and How to Get One, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://blog.reputationx.com/different-knowledge-panels
  16. Jason Barnard – The Knowledge Graph Conference, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.knowledgegraph.tech/speakers/jason-barnard/
  17. The Knowledge Panel Course: Managing People Also Search For and Related Searches, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://jasonbarnard.com/digital-marketing/the-kalicube-process/courses/knowledge-panel-course/the-knowledge-panel-course-managing-people-also-search-for-and-related-searches/
  18. How to Get a Google Knowledge Panel | Clearscope, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.clearscope.io/blog/how-to-get-a-google-knowledge-panel
  19. Google Knowledge Graph insights with Authoritas SERPs API, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.authoritas.com/case-studies/kalicube-pro-serps-api-knowledge-panels
  20. Google Knowledge Panel Service – Media Removal, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://mediaremoval.com/google-knowledge-panel-service/
  21. Google Knowledge Panel Service – Reputation X, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.reputationx.com/services/improve/kp
  22. You will get a google knowledge Panel or google knowledge graph for anyone – Upwork, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.upwork.com/services/product/marketing-a-google-knowledge-panel-or-google-knowledge-graph-for-anyone-1526311563239620608
  23. How To Create A Google Knowledge Panel (Guaranteed), accessed on July 14, 2025, https://affordablereputationmanagement.com/create-google-knowledge-panel/
  24. One-on-One Consulting with Jason Barnard – Kalicube – Digital Brand Engineers, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://kalicube.com/solutions/one-on-one-consulting-with-jason-barnard/
  25. Jason Barnard: Entrepreneur, keynote speaker, author and CEO and founder of Kalicube, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://kalicube.pro/about/jasonbarnard
  26. Hire Jason Barnard to Speak | Get Pricing And Availability | Book Today – Gotham Artists, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://gothamartists.com/jason-barnard/
  27. Kalicube’s Brand SERP Success Stories – The Clients Journal, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://kalicube.com/case-studies/brand-serp/
  28. Kalicube Success Stories – The Clients’ Journal, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://kalicube.com/case-studies/page/3/
  29. Kalicube Success Stories – The Clients’ Journal, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://kalicube.com/case-studies/
  30. Kalicube’s Knowledge Panel Success Stories – The Clients Journal, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://kalicube.com/case-studies/knowledge-panel/
  31. Who are some of Kalicube’s clients or notable success stories? – Jason BARNARD, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://jasonbarnard.com/insights/career/who-are-some-of-kalicubes-clients-or-notable-success-stories/
  32. Internet Reputation Repair – Reputation X Reviews – Google Sites, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://sites.google.com/site/internetreputationrepair/companies/reputation-x-review
  33. Reputation X Reviews 2025: Details, Pricing, & Features – G2, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.g2.com/products/reputation-x/reviews
  34. Reputation X | BBB Business Profile | Better Business Bureau, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.bbb.org/us/ca/mill-valley/profile/internet-marketing-services/reputation-x-1116-528474
  35. Reputation Management Service Testimonials – Reputation X, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.reputationx.com/testimonials
  36. The History of Reputation Management, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://blog.reputationx.com/history-of-orm
  37. www.reputationx.com, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.reputationx.com/services/improve/kp#:~:text=To%20be%20eligible%20for%20a%20Google%20Knowledge%20Panel%2C%20an%20individual,%2C%20excluding%20user%2Dgenerated%20content.
  38. Media Removal Reviews – Read Reviews on Mediaremoval.com Before You Buy – REVIEWS.io, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://www.reviews.io/company-reviews/store/mediaremoval.com
  39. Media Removal: Content Removal Services & ORM, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://mediaremoval.com/
  40. Review Removal Service, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://mediaremoval.com/review-removal-service/
  41. Google Review Removals Service, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://mediaremoval.com/google-review-removals-service/
  42. List of sources cited in Google Knowledge Panels – Kalicube Pro, accessed on July 14, 2025, https://kalicube.pro/tools/trusted-sources

Similar Posts